“Do you could have footage of your daughter in her new college uniform?” When a girl requested this query, it was high quality.
When a 44-year-old man requested, he received fired.
And nearly everybody at r/legaladviceUK agrees it was proper to fireplace him as a result of it was tremendous creepy.
However the OP has autism of a extreme sufficient nature that he’s simply landed his first job at 44. And he says (and for the needs of this submit and dialogue, we are going to imagine him) that he was copying his coworker’s conduct with the specific concept of bonding with coworkers.
I don’t know something about UK legislation, however I do suppose that is an fascinating case. If this had been a US case, ought to the corporate have handled him in another way due to his autism? (He says folks knew he was autistic.)
What sort of lodging are sensible and mandatory underneath the ADA?
Is there a world through which this leads to a dialog with the worker fairly than termination?
I’m assuming OP is a person, however it’s doable that OP is feminine. But when he’s a person, this provides one other layer. A feminine worker requested a query, and a male worker requested the identical query, and just one was terminated.
This will have been the 14th time he stated one thing inappropriate. It might have been the primary. If it was the primary time, then I believe a dialogue can be so as. If it’s the 14th, then sure, termination.
What do you all suppose?
