The standard company playbook has lengthy equated ambition with pace. Climb the ladder rapidly, accumulate promotions, chase greater paychecks and ultimately transfer into management. However Singapore’s youthful workforce is more and more rejecting this one-size-fits-all definition of success.
As an alternative, Gen Zs and millennials are making extra deliberate, calculated choices about their careers, prioritizing stability, abilities growth, wellbeing and goal over speedy development. In keeping with Deloitte’s newest World 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey, half of Gen Zs and millennials in Singapore have postponed main life choices due to their monetary circumstances, whereas solely a minority see management as their main profession aspiration. But, that is removed from a technology missing drive or ambition. Relatively, they’re redefining what progress appears like.

Mark Nicholas Teoh, Human Capital Chief, Deloitte South-East Asia, believes this shift represents a profound change in how youthful workers consider their careers. “The largest shift is in what counts as progress,” he says. “Fifteen years in the past, success was measured by the pace of the climb: title, promotion, pay. Right this moment’s Gen Zs and millennials measure success by whether or not the climb is sustainable.”
The survey discovered that solely about one-quarter of Gen Zs and one-fifth of millennials in Singapore search fast-paced profession progress. As an alternative, most choose regular progress, whereas round one in 5 are keen to maneuver laterally and even settle for extra junior roles if it results in a greater long-term match.
“Ambition has not fallen,” Teoh says. “The standards for fulfillment have modified.”
See additionally: Why Gen Z, millennials are turning to ‘aspect jobs’ to remain afloat
The rise of discernment
This 12 months’s report describes the attitudes of youthful workers as “a coming-of-age story not of delay, however of discernment”. The excellence is important for employers.
“Delay implies these generations will ultimately revert to conventional timelines, permitting employers to attend them out,” says Teoh. “Discernment suggests they’re making deliberate decisions about when and underneath what situations they commit, they usually intend to carry these requirements.”
Certainly, the survey paints an image of a workforce grappling with vital financial pressures. Price of residing stays the highest concern amongst each Gen Zs and millennials in Singapore, and housing affordability continues to affect profession choices for a lot of respondents. Greater than half report delaying main milestones comparable to marriage, beginning a household or pursuing additional schooling due to monetary constraints.
But, regardless of these pressures, youthful workers aren’t standing nonetheless.
“They’re sequencing, not stalling,” Teoh explains. “The identical respondents who’ve postponed main life choices are investing laborious in abilities and flexibility.”
This has essential implications for employers.
“In observe, employers in Singapore are inspired to cease designing careers round a single, linear observe,” he says. “Reward breadth and lateral motion as indicators of excessive efficiency, somewhat than as drift. The employers who mistake selectiveness for a scarcity of drive danger dropping precisely the expertise they want to retain.”
Employers are forward within the AI race
If there may be one space the place Gen Zs and millennials in Singapore are transferring sooner than their employers, it’s AI. The survey discovered that 88% of Gen Zs and 86% of millennials in Singapore use AI of their day-to-day work, considerably greater than world averages. But fewer than one-third consider the AI instruments offered by their employers are enough.
To Teoh, this disconnect reveals an uncomfortable fact. “The inversion tells us people are adopting at client pace whereas organizations undertake at enterprise pace,” he says, noting that the divide is wider in Singapore than in most markets.
The issue, in his view, is that almost all organizations stay in “use-case mode”—pilots and proofs of idea that work in isolation however don’t embed AI into how work truly will get completed. He cites Deloitte analysis findings indicating that greater than 4 in 5 organizations globally haven’t redesigned jobs to include AI capabilities. “Regardless of the workforce adapting to AI, the character of labor stays stagnant,” he provides.
Closing that hole, he argues, means redesigning roles in order that the division of labor between people and AI is express, rebuilding workflows in order that the know-how sits throughout the course of somewhat than alongside it, equipping managers to guide that redesign and constructing governance into the instruments themselves. The urge for food amongst workers is there: Forty % of Gen Zs and 47% of millennials in Singapore say they are going to proceed to hunt new AI coaching because the know-how evolves, once more forward of worldwide ranges.
Management with out burnout
The survey additionally challenges standard assumptions about management ambition. Whereas 81% of Gen Zs and 67% of millennials in Singapore say they’re excited by management roles sooner or later of their careers, solely 6% and three%, respectively, establish management as their main profession objective.
Removed from signaling a scarcity of ambition, Teoh believes these findings level to one thing deeper. “This technology is redefining ambition,” he says. “Management, because the function is at the moment constructed, has not confirmed its value.”
Stress, burnout, extreme accountability and the perceived sacrifice of labor/life stability are among the many key explanation why youthful workers hesitate to pursue management positions. “This isn’t a rejection of management, however a judgment on the way in which this function is commonly structured,” says Teoh.
He pointed to at least one discovering he known as notably telling: These already in senior roles are likely to report higher psychological well being and work/life stability than their subordinates, and are much less more likely to cite lengthy hours as a supply of stress. The wariness, in different phrases, could also be formed by how administration appears from the surface—“always-on and continuously receiving strain”—somewhat than the way it truly feels to do.
The danger of misreading this pattern, he says, is twofold. “Employers who conclude ‘no person desires to guide’ will under-invest of their pipeline, simply as boomer retirements make succession planning extra pressing,” Teoh says.
And those that fail to reframe the notion of management could watch their most succesful individuals pursue it elsewhere. “The repair to this situation will not be motivational—it’s structural,” he says, pointing to sustainable workloads, real flexibility and credible pathways to development.
A workforce in transition
Beneath these themes runs a longer-term concern. As boomers retire, millennials and Gen Zs step up, and Gen Alpha approaches, Singapore is getting into what the report calls a once-in-a-generation workforce transition—and confidence in continuity is skinny. Simply 44% of Gen Zs and 61% of millennials consider their crew might preserve efficiency if a key knowledgeable left tomorrow.
Teoh framed the problem as one among “expertise structure”: how organizations assist individuals construct judgment when the normal methods of creating it are eroding at each ends of the workforce, as consultants retire and AI absorbs the entry-level duties that after fashioned the primary rungs of the ladder. The obstacles respondents cite are largely structural: Forty-four % of Gen Zs level to a scarcity of incentives or recognition for sharing data and 35% to a scarcity of time, whereas millennials most frequently cite the absence of normal templates or instruments (39%) and confidentiality considerations (32%). “The system doesn’t present an incentive to cross it on,” Teoh says.
In the end, organizations that thrive within the years forward might be people who embed studying, apprenticeship and shared decision-making instantly into work design.
“Concord workshops and reverse-mentoring schemes could be invaluable, however they don’t transfer judgment at scale. Redesigned roles, shared choices and structured apprenticeship inside the actual work do,” Teoh concludes. “The organizations that get this proper will quietly compound a bonus 12 months after 12 months, and those that don’t could solely acknowledge the fee when an knowledgeable leaves.”


